Linda Fruhvirtova vs Jodie Anna Burrage Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 01:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Fruhvirtova vs J. Anna Burrage

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Fruhvirtova 1 - 0 Burrage
They have played 2 sets in total, with Linda Fruhvirtova winning 2 and Jodie Anna Burrage winning 0. The last match between Linda Fruhvirtova and Jodie Anna Burrage was at the Lexus Birmingham Open - Birmingham, 04-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Linda Fruhvirtova getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Fruhvirtova | 1 |
Burrage | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) Lexus Birmingham Open - Birmingham(06-04-25)
L. Fruhvirtova vs J. A. Burrage H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$1,071,861 | Career Prize Money | $610,536 |
53.85% (133-114) | Career Total W/L | 57.36% (261-194) |
1 | Grass | 0 |
4 | Titles | 6 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
37.50% (3-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (4-8) |
L. Fruhvirtova vs J. A. Burrage Match Preview
- Second Serve Performance: Burrage has been more successful on second serve points, winning 43.44% compared to Fruhvirtova's 37.99% in the past six months. Does this offer Burrage an edge? It might suggest greater resilience in extended rallies.
- Return Game Stats: Fruhvirtova shows superior return skills, taking 55.19% of points on opponents' second serves against Burrage's 50%, and outperforms on first serve returns, winning 35.46% to Burrage's 27.76%. Could this indicate Fruhvirtova's aggressive play style? It certainly strengthens her chances when returning.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Burrage edges Fruhvirtova in saving breakpoints, converting 55.16% against Fruhvirtova's 51.45%. Is this a sign of mental fortitude under pressure? It may well be crucial in tight scenarios.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Burrage has a better win rate of 54.9% compared to Fruhvirtova's 48.21%, indicating a slight overall competitive edge.
- Best Surface: Both players excel on indoor hard courts, but Burrage's 62% win rate tops Fruhvirtova's 59%. Does this suggest a probable advantage on this surface? It could sway the match if played on indoor hard.
- Player Level: Burrage’s success rate of 66.67% in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K surpasses Fruhvirtova's 55.17%, hinting at better recent form in similar settings.
- Opponent Quality: Burrage has faced slightly tougher competition, with opponents averaging a ranking of 230.49 compared to Fruhvirtova’s 241.89. Does this tougher schedule prepare Burrage better for challenging matches? It's a testament to her experience against higher-ranked players.
- Deciding Set Performance: Interestingly, Fruhvirtova has a better record in deciding sets, winning 50% of them over the last year, whilst Burrage won 42%.
- Break Point Conversion: Fruhvirtova excels with a 39.73% conversion rate on breakpoints compared to Burrage's 29.68%. Could this be the deciding factor? It points towards greater efficiency in converting opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the current statistics and performance indicators presents an intriguing matchup between Fruhvirtova and Burrage. Burrage shows strength with a superior second serve performance, suggesting her ability to maintain momentum even when defensive. However, Fruhvirtova counters strongly with impressive return stats, a critical factor in altering the match's rhythm.
Burrage's ability to save breakpoints under pressure might grant her the upper hand in high-stakes moments. However, her lower break point conversion rate could spell difficulty against an opponent like Fruhvirtova, who excels in capitalizing on opportunities.
Fruhvirtova's efficiency in deciding sets and superior break point conversion highlights her capability in clutch situations, suggesting a determined and focused approach when the match is on the line.
Taking into account their recent form, playing conditions, and skill on indoor hard courts, Burrage's better overall performance over the past year and richer experience against stronger opponents appear significant. However, Fruhvirtova's strengths in returns and break point opportunities make her a formidable contender. Given these factors, Fruhvirtova seems slightly more likely to win this encounter.
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Jodie Anna Burrage Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Fruhvirtova vs J. A. Burrage H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:25:49 | Avg. Match Time | 1:25:49 |
51% (27/53) | 1st Serve % | 39% (27/69) |
78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (17/27) |
54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (15/42) |
36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
54% (37/69) | Return Pts Won % | 34% (18/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
J. A. Burrage Recent Matches Played

L. Fruhvirtova vs J. A. Burrage Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53.85% (133/114) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.36% (261/194) |
53.30% (307/269) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.06% (598/432) |
51.77% (2748/2560) | Games Win/Loss | 53.36% (5081/4441) |
57.43% (85/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.30% (161/106) |
41.18% (21/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.43% (7/16) |
60.00% (12/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.61% (72/43) |
53.57% (15/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.00% (21/29) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
633 | Aces Total | 1719 |
0.46 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
1198 | Total Double Faults | 1541 |
1:46:26 | Average Match Time | 1:25:24 |
313.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.2 |
61% (10777/17609) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16755/28538) |
64% (6907/10777) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11227/16755) |
42% (2862/6832) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5428/11783) |
48% (1063/2234) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1595/3425) |
46% (8116/17572) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12737/28682) |
46.43% (13/15) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (7/14) |
43.24% (16/21) | Masters W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
49.32% (36/37) | Main Tour W/L | 44.12% (30/38) |
59.34% (54/37) | Challenger W/L | 61.31% (168/106) |
82.35% (14/3) | Futures W/L | 67.50% (54/26) |
53% (130/243) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (257/447) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
52% (28/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (54/105) |
48% (39/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (48/127) |
86% (127/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (287/233) |
13% (127/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (287/52) |
18% (120/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (168/27) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
